Simply put, here's the quick answer for those of you who don't get it concerning Matt Welch's short-but-mischievous reign at Reason magazine (italics are mine):

I believe that Reason has become overly obsessed with its conception of itself as "the most influential libertarian publication in America". This has led the editors at Reason to grant prominent and respectful space to authors promoting overtly statist and anti-libertarian viewpoints. At the same time, many writers at Reason act as if they are the sole arbiters of acceptable libertarian viewpoints. Consider the fact that Matt Welch chose to attack Ron Paul, Lew Rockwell and Murray Rothbard in his first editorial as editor in chief at Reason. This decision, coupled with his willingness to misrepresent the views of Paul, Rockwell and Rothbard suggest that he is more interested in maintaining acceptable liberal credentials than in promoting a principled defense of libertarianism.

Mr. Parfitt is pointing out the bloody problem that I had assumed was so obvious.